Official provider facts
Eligibility, payout rules and other conditions from public provider documents. They describe the published rule, not every individual experience.
How we verify
platforms.
We show what each source supports, what remains unknown and when each fact was checked. Different evidence layers are never blended into an artificial overall score.
Aggregated user-review signals
Public rating data with platform, score, volume, distribution and snapshot date. It is an experience signal, not verified earnings evidence.
Independent reports
Consumer reports, labour-platform ratings or relevant research. Each finding is used only for the question the report actually examined.
Visible evidence gap
If no reputable provider-specific report is found, we say so. Affiliate articles and provider testimonials do not fill the gap.
Rule 01
Keep sources separate
Provider terms, public ratings and external research remain distinct. A high review score does not cancel a documented contractual limit, or vice versa.
Rule 02
Show volume and date
A rating without review count and snapshot date is incomplete. Global profiles are not presented as Germany-only results.
Rule 03
Mark conflicts
When terms, FAQs or current help pages disagree, the conflict remains visible. We do not simply choose the more attractive claim.
Rule 04
Avoid false precision
Payout time, task supply and personal earnings depend on the person and case. Provider figures are labelled as such, not presented as our forecast.
Sorting rule
There is no paid-for winner.
The comparison defaults to most recently checked. The navigator counts only verifiable matches with your chosen conditions and shows conflicts separately. Commissions are never a factor.